Peran Ibu Kota sebagai Pusat Kegiatan Nasional dalam Mendukung Interaksi Keruangan Pada Area Hinterland

Authors

  • Edy Abdurrahman Syahrir Program Studi Teknik Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota, Universitas Sulawesi Tenggara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36709/jppg.v10i1.376

Keywords:

add value, hinterland, Kendari City, national activity center

Abstract

Spatial existence in Southeast Sulawesi Province in land areas tends to be concentrated in each district capital. The macro regional conditions are focused on a certain center, namely Kendari City as the National Activity Center so that its development affects the hinterland area. This research aims to identify the level of strength of spatial interaction between Kendari City as a National Activity Center and its hinterland area, as well as the level of connectivity between Kendari City regions and its hinterland in supporting inter-regional development. The analytical method for this research uses Gravity Model Analysis and Centrality Index based on Konig-Shimbel. The results of this research show that the hinterland area with a strong level of interaction strength with Kendari City only occurs in the South Konawe Regency area with a value of 1,052,223,272 interaction units. Then the most strategic areas based on the results of the connectivity analysis are South Konawe Regency and East Kolaka Regency because they received the lowest Konig-Shimbel score (having a value of 1). Meanwhile, the other areas had the highest score and had the lowest strategic value with a value range between 2-7. Therefore, it is hoped that the results of this research can be a lesson for regional planners to better understand the importance of spatial interaction and easy accessibility between regions as a process of establishing positioning to create place prosperity and people prosperity.

References

Abdullah, N., Syam, N., dan Surur, F. (2021). Analisis Interaksi Keruangan dalam Mendukung Optimalisasi Pengembangan Potensi Wilayah Kepulauan. Jurnal Muara Sains, Teknologi, Kedokteran, dan Ilmu Kesehatan, 5(1), 59–62.

Badan Pusat Statistik [BPS]. (2024). Provinsi Banten Dalam Angka 2024. Banten.

Bappenas. (2020). Strategi Kolaborasi untuk Dorong Pembangunan Daerah. Jakarta.

Bintarto, R. (1989). Interaksi Desa-Kota dan Permasalahannya. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.

Chandra, E. A. (2022). Identifikasi Pusat Pertumbuhan dan Wilayah Hinterland di Kabupaten Bengkalis. Skripsi. Universitas Islam Riau. Riau.

Dhali, M. K., Chakraborty, M., dan Sahana, M. (2019). Assessing Spatio-Temporal Growth of Urban Sub-Centre Using Shannon’s Entropy Model and Principle Component Analysis: A Case From North 24 Parganas, Lower Ganga River Basin, India. The Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Science, 22(1), 25-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrs.2018.02.002.

Fudhail, I., Sambodo, H., dan Purnomo, S. D. (2021). Identifikasi Pusat Pertumbuhan dan Analisis Interaksi Spasial Perekonomian di Provinsi Jawa Timur. J-MAS (Jurnal Manajemen dan Sains), 6(1), 43-52

Giyarsih, S. R. (2016). Factors That Affect Urban Sprawl Symptoms in Sub Urban Areas of Yogyakarta. In The 8th International Graduate Students and Scholars’ Conference in Indonesia (IGSSCI). Yogyakarta Universitas Gadjah Mada. https://doi.org/10.31227/osf.io/juc26

Hamid, A. (2016). Pola Interaksi Keruangan dan Proses Pembentukan Sistem Aktifitas Perkotaan (Studi Kasus: Kota Ternate, Kota Tidore Kepulauan dan Kota Sofifi). Skripsi. Universitas Bosowa, Makassar.

Hariyanto, A. (2017). Studi Pengembangan Ekonomi Lokal Terkait Interaksi Desa-Kota.” Jurnal Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota, 14(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.29313/jpwk.v14i1.2552

Hikmah, N. I., dan Indrayati, A. U. (2021). Arahan Pengembangan Wilayah Kedungsepur Melalui Interaksi Keruangan Antar Kabupaten-Kota. Geo-Image Journal, 10(1), 74-84.

He, J., Li, C., Yu, Y., Liu, Y., dan Huang, J. (2017). Measuring Urban Spatial Interaction in Wuhan Urban Agglomeration, Central China: A Spatially Explicit Approach. Sustainable Cities and Society, 32, 569–83.

Iyer, K. C., dan Thomas, N. (2020). A Critical Review on Regional Connectivity Scheme of India. Transportation Research Procedia, 48(1), 47–59.

Kartikakirana, R. A. (2019). Interaksi Spasial di Kota Terpadu Mandiri Lunang Silaut Kabupaten Pesisir Selatan Sumatera Barat. Plano Madani: Jurnal Perencana-an Wilayah dan Kota, 8(1), 36-47.

Mansury, Y., dan Shin, J. K. (2015). Size, Connectivity, and Tipping in Spatial Networks: Theory and Empirics. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 54(1), 428–37.

Mndala, L., dan Kudale, A. (2019). Distribution and Social Determinants of Overweight and Obesity: A Cross-Sectional Study of Non-Pregnant Adult Women from The Malawi Demographic and Health Survey (2015-2016). Epidemiology and Health, 41, e2019039. https://doi.org/10.4178/epih.e2019039.

Nurrady, T. I., Dewanti, D., dan Herwangi, Y. (2020). Tingkat Keterkaitan Fisik Kota Inti dan Kota Satelit di Kawasan Metropolitan PEKANSIKAWAN (Pekanbaru, Siak, Kampar, Pelalawan). Region: Jurnal Pembangunan Wilayah dan Perencanaan Partisipatif, 15(1), 119-138.

Permana, S., Lubis, D. P., Rahmadi, M. T., Panjaitan, R. D., dan Sari, Y. A. (2023). Analisis Struktur Ruang dan Implikasinya Terhadap Pembangunan di Kabupaten Samosir. Jurnal Pendidikan Geografi Undiksha, 11(3), 240–254.

Pramono, R. W. D., dan Suminar, R. E. (2019). Ekonomi Wilayah Untuk Perencanaan Tata Ruang. Yogyakarta: Deepublish.

Rustiadi, E. (2018). Perencanaan dan Pengembangan Wilayah. Jakarta: Yayasan Pustaka Obar Indonesia.

Saksono, H. (2019). Manajemen Perencanaan Pembangunan Daerah Berbasis Penelitian & Pengembangan dan Desain & Inovasi. Jurnal Kebijakan Pembangunan, 14(2), 213-226.

Taufiqqurrachman, F. (2024). Kajian Indeks Skalogram, Indeks Sentralitas Marshall dan Indeks Gravitasi Pada Penentuan Pusat-Pusat Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Jawa Timur. Innovative: Journal of Social Science Research, 4(1), 5952-5963

Tuar, I. G., Sela, R. L., dan Lakat, R. S. (2021). Kajian Pusat-Pusat Pelayanan Kota Tomohon Berdasarkan Hirarki. Spasial, 8(1), 133-142.

Whynne-Hammond, C. (1979). Elements of Human Geography. London: George Allen & Unwin.

Published

2025-01-02

How to Cite

Syahrir, E. A. (2025). Peran Ibu Kota sebagai Pusat Kegiatan Nasional dalam Mendukung Interaksi Keruangan Pada Area Hinterland. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Geografi, 10(1), 15–24. https://doi.org/10.36709/jppg.v10i1.376

Issue

Section

Articles